Why it is computationally harder to reconstruct the past than to predict the future
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1376490
DOI10.1007/BF02435838zbMath0885.65047OpenAlexW2045461672MaRDI QIDQ1376490
Misha Koshelev, Günter Mayer, G. E. Alefeld
Publication date: 2 April 1998
Published in: International Journal of Theoretical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02435838
Lua error in Module:PublicationMSCList at line 37: attempt to index local 'msc_result' (a nil value).
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- NP-hard classes of linear algebraic systems with uncertainties
- Approximate linear algebra is intractable
- Compatibility of approximate solution of linear equations with given error bounds for coefficients and right-hand sides
- The Shape of the Solution Set for Systems of Interval Linear Equations with Dependent Coefficients
- On the Shape of the Symmetric, Persymmetric, and Skew-Symmetric Solution Set
- Computing Exact Componentwise Bounds on Solutions of Lineary Systems with Interval Data is NP-Hard
This page was built for publication: Why it is computationally harder to reconstruct the past than to predict the future