Proof complexity in algebraic systems and bounded depth Frege systems with modular counting
DOI10.1007/BF01294258zbMath0890.03030OpenAlexW1968655942MaRDI QIDQ1377580
Alexander A. Razborov, Pavel Pudlák, Jan Krajíček, Russell Impagliazzo, Jiří Sgall, Samuel R. Buss
Publication date: 29 June 1998
Published in: Computational Complexity (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01294258
lower boundmodular countingFrege proof systemcounting principledegree of polynomialsNullstellensatz proof systempolynomial calculus proof system
Complexity of computation (including implicit computational complexity) (03D15) Classical propositional logic (03B05) Structure of proofs (03F07) Complexity of proofs (03F20)
Related Items (23)
Cites Work
- Exponential lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle
- The intractability of resolution
- Lower bounds for the polynomial calculus
- \(\text{Count}(q)\) does not imply \(\text{Count}(p)\)
- Some remarks on lengths of propositional proofs
- The independence of the modulo p counting principles
- Many hard examples for resolution
- Hard examples for resolution
- Approximation and Small-Depth Frege Proofs
- The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems
- Provability of the pigeonhole principle and the existence of infinitely many primes
- Lower bounds to the size of constant-depth propositional proofs
- An exponential lower bound to the size of bounded depth frege proofs of the pigeonhole principle
- Lower Bounds on Hilbert's Nullstellensatz and Propositional Proofs
- The Complexity of Propositional Proofs
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: Proof complexity in algebraic systems and bounded depth Frege systems with modular counting