FDEM: How we make the FDM more flexible than the FEM

DOI10.1016/S0377-0427(03)00461-8zbMath1027.65151MaRDI QIDQ1408407

Torsten Adolph, Willi Schönauer

Publication date: 15 September 2003

Published in: Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

algorithmNavier-Stokes equationsfinite element methodconsistencyfinite difference methodnumerical examplesparallel computationError estimateBlack-box solver

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Stability and convergence of numerical methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N12) Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N30) Navier-Stokes equations (35Q30) Parallel numerical computation (65Y05) Finite difference methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N06)

Related Items (2)

Experiments with a local adaptive grid \(h\)-refinement for the finite-difference solution of BVPs in singularly perturbed second-order ODEs ⋮ Variational finite difference methods in linear and nonlinear problems of the deformation of metallic and composite shells (review)

Uses Software

• LINSOL
• FDEM

Cites Work

• The integration of different variants of the (I)LU algorithm in the LINSOL program package
• On the Causality of Linear Time Invariant Descriptor Systems
• Generation of Difference and Error Formulae of Arbitrary Consistency Order on an Unstructured Grid
• Variants of BICGSTAB for Matrices with Complex Spectrum
• How we solve PDEs
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: FDEM: How we make the FDM more flexible than the FEM