``Agreeing to disagree type results: a decision-theoretic approach.

DOI10.1016/S0304-4068(03)00003-XzbMath1054.91019MaRDI QIDQ1415909

Chenghu Ma, Xiao Luo

Publication date: 9 December 2003

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

Agreeing to disagreeDecision-theoretic approachNo trade theorem

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Knowledge representation (68T30)

Related Items (1)

Rational expectations can preclude trades

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Learning to agree
• Dynamically consistent beliefs must be Bayesian
• On the logic of ``agreeing to disagree type results
• Some extensions of a claim of Aumann in an axiomatic model of knowledge
• Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
• Information, trade and common knowledge
• Agreeing to disagree
• Nash equilibrium under Knightian uncertainty: Breaking down backward induction
• Preference, rationalizability and equilibrium
• Equilibrium in beliefs under uncertainty
• Recursive multiple-priors.
• Characterizing common priors in the form of posteriors
• Rationalizable trade
• A no-trade theorem under Knightian uncertainty with general preferences
• Logical structure of common knowledge
• On the duality between prior beliefs and trading demands
• The logic of belief and belief change: a decision theoretic approach
• Choquet rationality
• Common beliefs and the existence of speculative trade
• Ignoring ignorance and agreeing to disagree
• A More Robust Definition of Subjective Probability
• Trade with Heterogeneous Prior Beliefs and Asymmetric Information
• "Beliefs about Beliefs" without Probabilities
• Coping with ignorance: Unforeseen contingencies and non-additive uncertainty
• Stable equilibrium in beliefs in extensive games with perfect information

This page was built for publication: ``Agreeing to disagree type results: a decision-theoretic approach.