Is symbolic integration better than numerical integration in satellite dynamics?

DOI10.1016/S0893-9659(04)90012-2zbMath1039.70001OpenAlexW1981540419MaRDI QIDQ1433233

D. Massart

Publication date: 15 June 2004

Published in: Applied Mathematics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0893-9659(04)90012-2

zbMATH Keywords

computer algebra systemssatellite dynamicsLie transformations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computational methods for problems pertaining to mechanics of particles and systems (70-08) Orbital mechanics (70M20) Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to mechanics of particles and systems (70-04)

Related Items (2)

The asymptotic expansion method via symbolic computation ⋮ Asymptotic ordination of artificial satellite Hamiltonian

Uses Software

• PSPC
• Unnamed Item

Cites Work

• ATESAT: A symbolic processor for artificial satellite theory
• Painting the Phase Space Portrait of an Integrable Dynamical System
• Elimination of the perigee in the satellite problem
• Simplify or perish
• The elimination of the parallax in satellite theory
• A geoid and world geodetic system based on a combination of gravimetric, astrogeodetic, and satellite data
• Canonical transformations depending on a small parameter
• Delaunay normalisations
• Competetive symbolic integration in satellite dynamics
• Short-term evolution of artificial satellites

This page was built for publication: Is symbolic integration better than numerical integration in satellite dynamics?