Choosing the tree which actually best explains the data: another look at the bootstrap in phylogenetic reconstruction.

DOI10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00081-XzbMath1061.62569OpenAlexW2117327417WikidataQ126748866 ScholiaQ126748866MaRDI QIDQ1566634

G. Caraux, Vincent Berry, Olivier Gascuel

Publication date: 4 June 2000

Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9473(99)00081-x

zbMATH Keywords

OverfittingCross validationPhylogeny reconstructionBootstrap resampling methodsComplexitygoodness-of-fitFour-point conditionQuartetsStructural distanceTree estimation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Problems related to evolution (92D15) Nonparametric statistical resampling methods (62G09)

Uses Software

• BIONJ
• bootstrap

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Reconstructing the shape of a tree from observed dissimilarity data
• Comparison of phylogenetic trees
• The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees
• Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
• A note on the metric properties of trees
• A reduction algorithm for approximating a (nonmetric) dissimilarity by a tree distance
• Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees

This page was built for publication: Choosing the tree which actually best explains the data: another look at the bootstrap in phylogenetic reconstruction.