Characterizing common priors in the form of posteriors

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1572940

DOI10.1006/jeth.1999.2592zbMath0983.91033OpenAlexW2033059935MaRDI QIDQ1572940

Yossi Feinberg

Publication date: 23 April 2002

Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1999.2592



Related Items

Almost common priors, Finite order implications of common priors in infinite models, Self-consistency, consistency and cycles in non-partitional knowledge models, Correlated equilibrium and higher order beliefs about play, Weakly rational expectations, No trade and yes trade theorems for heterogeneous priors, Monologues, dialogues, and common priors, Correlation and common priors in games with incomplete information, ``Agreeing to disagree type results under ambiguity, Agreement theorem for neo-additive beliefs, Belief consistency and trade consistency, ``Agreeing to disagree type results: a decision-theoretic approach., Order on types based on monotone comparative statics, Unnamed Item, The cycles approach, Interim efficiency with MEU-preferences, Monotonic models and cycles, Similarity of differential information with subjective prior beliefs, Agreeing to disagree in probabilistic dynamic epistemic~logic, Why Bother with Syntax?, Agreeing to agree and Dutch books, The positive foundation of the common prior assumption, Correlated-belief equilibrium, Countable spaces and common priors, Speculation under unawareness, Iterated expectations, compact spaces, and common priors, Payoff continuity in incomplete information games: a comment, Agreeable bets with multiple priors, Common priors under endogenous uncertainty, Agreeing to disagree in a countable space of equiprobable states of nature, Interim efficient allocations under uncertainty, From posteriors to priors via cycles, RATIONALIZATION IN SIGNALING GAMES: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, On the duality between prior beliefs and trading demands, Rational expectations can preclude trades, Consistency of beliefs and epistemic conditions for Nash and correlated equilibria, PEOPLE WITH COMMON PRIORS CAN AGREE TO DISAGREE, Agreeing to disagree with conditional probability systems, Charges and bets: a general characterisation of common priors, Characterizing the common prior assumption.



Cites Work