Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system

DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00372-5zbMath0979.90504OpenAlexW1973146435MaRDI QIDQ1579472

Freerk A. Lootsma, Robin C. van den Honert

Publication date: 18 February 2002

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00372-5

zbMATH Keywords

aggregationpairwise comparisonsnegotiationsreference levelsacceptability scoresmultiple issue conflictsREMBRANDT system

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (4)

Systemic decision making in AHP: a Bayesian approach ⋮ Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system ⋮ Further analysis on matrix operation of AHP ⋮ An MCDA approach for the selection of bike projects based on structuring and appraising activities

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Consistent weights for judgements matrices on the relative importance of alternatives
• Fuzzy logic for planning and decision making
• Comparison of REMBRANDT system with analytic hierarchy process
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• Power Relations and Group Aggregation in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART
• Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART

This page was built for publication: Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system