Knock-out for descriptive utility or experimental-design error?

DOI10.1007/BF01224765zbMath1010.91027OpenAlexW1990317488MaRDI QIDQ1601336

Ulrich Schmidt, Stefan Traub, Christian Seidl, Peter Grösche

Publication date: 26 June 2002

Published in: Journal of Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01224765

zbMATH Keywords

subjective equivalence of gamblesexperimental design of utility scalinggeneric-utility theory

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Utility theory (91B16)

Cites Work

• Classification of concatenation measurement structures according to scale type
• Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles
• Where does subjective expected utility fail descriptively?
• Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
• Generic utility theory: Measurement foundations and applications in multiattribute utility theory
• An experimental test of a general class of utility models: Evidence for context dependency
• A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts
• Reanalysis of the Chechile-Cooke experiment: Correcting for mismatched gambles
• Additivity, utility, and subjective probability
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Knock-out for descriptive utility or experimental-design error?