The use of calibration weighting for variance estimation under systematic sampling: applications to forest cover assessment
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1618095
DOI10.1007/s13253-018-0325-xzbMath1426.62340OpenAlexW2807664569MaRDI QIDQ1618095
Lorenzo Fattorini, Timothy G. Gregoire, Sara Trentini
Publication date: 13 November 2018
Published in: Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-018-0325-x
Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics (62P12) Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Spatially Balanced Sampling through the Pivotal Method
- Spatially correlated Poisson sampling
- Model assisted survey sampling
- A new class of unbiased estimators of the variance of the systematic sample mean
- Model-Based Non-parametric Variance Estimation for Systematic Sampling
- On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection
- On estimating the variance of the systematic sample mean
- Spatially Balanced Sampling of Natural Resources
- Applying the Horvitz-Thompson criterion in complex designs: A computer-intensive perspective for estimating inclusion probabilities
- Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse
- Introduction to variance estimation
- Doubly balanced spatial sampling with spreading and restitution of auxiliary totals
This page was built for publication: The use of calibration weighting for variance estimation under systematic sampling: applications to forest cover assessment