When do utilitarianism and egalitarianism agree on evaluation? An intersection approach

DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2018.05.002zbMath1395.91168OpenAlexW2804166861WikidataQ129771356 ScholiaQ129771356MaRDI QIDQ1645206

Kohei Kamaga

Publication date: 28 June 2018

Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2018.05.002

zbMATH Keywords

utilitarianismegalitarianismsocial welfare orderingPigou-Dalton equity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Utility theory (91B16) Social choice (91B14)

Related Items (1)

An axiomatization of the mixed utilitarian-maximin social welfare orderings

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• `Non-interference' implies equality
• Rawls and Bentham reconciled
• Generalized Gini inequality indices
• Leximin and utilitarian rules: A joint characterization
• Leximin population ethics
• Rawls versus Bentham: An axiomatic examination of the pure distribution problem
• min, max, and sum
• Quasi-orderings and population ethics
• On the impossibility of complete non-interference in Paretian social judgements
• Transfer Sensitive Inequality Measures
• Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory
• Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle
• Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice
• On Interpersonal Comparability and Social Welfare Orderings
• Equity in Two Person Situations: Some Consequences
• The greatest unhappiness of the least number

This page was built for publication: When do utilitarianism and egalitarianism agree on evaluation? An intersection approach