Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1647510
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2018.03.001zbMath1445.68236OpenAlexW2793003329MaRDI QIDQ1647510
Guillermo R. Simari, Luciano H. Tamargo, Sebastian Gottifredi, Alejandro Javier García
Publication date: 26 June 2018
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/89017
Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42)
Related Items (6)
Formalization and implementation of credibility dynamics through prioritized multiple revision ⋮ Automatic knowledge generation for a persuasion dialogue system with enthymemes ⋮ Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations ⋮ Credibility dynamics: a belief-revision-based trust model with pairwise comparisons ⋮ Multi-source multiple change on belief bases ⋮ Optimizing group learning: an evolutionary computing approach
Uses Software
Cites Work
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- Resolving conflicting information
- A practical approach to revising prioritized knowledge bases
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- On the revision of informant credibility orders
- Review on computational trust and reputation models
- On Explanations for Non-Acceptable Arguments
- Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- A Belief-Based Approach to Measuring Message Acceptability
This page was built for publication: Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems
