Why forward induction leads to the backward induction outcome: a new proof for Battigalli's theorem
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1651228
DOI10.1016/j.geb.2018.04.001zbMath1400.91094OpenAlexW2797332813WikidataQ130039976 ScholiaQ130039976MaRDI QIDQ1651228
Publication date: 12 July 2018
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.04.001
monotonicitybackward inductionextensive-form rationalizabilityforward inductionorder independenceBattigalli's theorem
Games in extensive form (91A18) Dynamic games (91A25) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26)
Related Items
On non-monotonic strategic reasoning ⋮ Order independence for rationalizability ⋮ Two-period pricing and utilization decisions in a dual-channel service-only supply chain ⋮ Iterated elimination procedures ⋮ Rationalizability and epistemic priority orderings ⋮ Beliefs, plans, and perceived intentions in dynamic games ⋮ The algebraic geometry of perfect and sequential equilibrium: an extension ⋮ Common belief in rationality in games with unawareness ⋮ Prudent rationalizability in generalized extensive-form games with unawareness ⋮ Tenable threats when Nash equilibrium is the norm
Cites Work
- Robust dynamic implementation
- The logic of backward induction
- Keep `hoping' for rationality: a solution to the backward induction paradox
- Strategy subsets closed under rational behavior
- Conditional dominance, rationalizability, and game forms
- On rationalizability in extensive games
- Strong belief and forward induction reasoning.
- On the outcome equivalence of backward induction and extensive form rationalizability
- Belief in the opponents' future rationality
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
- Sequential Equilibria
- Backward Induction, Normal Form Perfection and Explicable Equilibria
- The order independence of iterated dominance in extensive games
- On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria
This page was built for publication: Why forward induction leads to the backward induction outcome: a new proof for Battigalli's theorem