Traditional or additive manufacturing? Assessing component design options through lifecycle cost analysis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1651711
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.015zbMath1403.90298OpenAlexW2579921723WikidataQ129910250 ScholiaQ129910250MaRDI QIDQ1651711
Bram Westerweel, Geert-Jan van Houtum, Rob J. I. Basten
Publication date: 12 July 2018
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://research.tue.nl/nl/publications/9c406f34-71e4-4fe8-9367-303bdbee15b3
Transportation, logistics and supply chain management (90B06) Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection in operations research (90B25) Production models (90B30)
Related Items (4)
A multi-objective optimization approach for exploring the cost and makespan trade-off in additive manufacturing ⋮ Using 3D-printing in disaster response: the two-stage stochastic 3D-printing knapsack problem ⋮ The impact of 3D printing on manufacturer-retailer supply chains ⋮ Purchase or rent? Optimal pricing for 3D printing capacity sharing platforms
Cites Work
- On the upgrading policy after the redesign of a component for reliability improvement
- Optimizing reliability and service parts logistics for a time-varying installed base
- Spare parts inventory control under system availability constraints
- Warranty and optimal reliability improvement through product development
- Optimization of component reliability in the design phase of capital goods
- Convexity Properties of the Erlang Loss Formula
This page was built for publication: Traditional or additive manufacturing? Assessing component design options through lifecycle cost analysis
