Competitive centipede games: zero-end payoffs and payoff inequality deter reciprocal cooperation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1651800
DOI10.3390/G6030262zbMath1402.91032OpenAlexW1866166291MaRDI QIDQ1651800
Andrew M. Colman, Briony D. Pulford, Eva M. Krockow
Publication date: 10 July 2018
Published in: Games (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g6030262
Cites Work
- Games of perfect information, predatory pricing and the chain-store paradox
- On the centipede game
- Experimental results on the centipede game in normal form: an investigation on learning
- A payoff uncertainty explanation of results in experimental centipede games
- On the validity of the random lottery incentive system
- Equilibrium play and adaptive learning in a three-person centipede game.
- Best-reply matching in games.
- Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality
- The breakdown of cooperation in iterative real-time trust dilemmas
- An experimental study of constant-sum centipede games
- Clocks and Trees: Isomorphic Dutch Auctions and Centipede Games
- An Experimental Study of the Centipede Game
- Rationality, Nash Equilibrium and Backwards Induction in Perfect- Information Games
This page was built for publication: Competitive centipede games: zero-end payoffs and payoff inequality deter reciprocal cooperation