Theory of mind and general intelligence in dictator and ultimatum games
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1651890
DOI10.3390/g9020016zbMath1403.91092OpenAlexW2794490621WikidataQ130047501 ScholiaQ130047501MaRDI QIDQ1651890
Hannes Lang, Michelle Bongard, Gregory J. Deangelo
Publication date: 10 July 2018
Published in: Games (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020016
Decision theory (91B06) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26) Experimental studies (91A90)
Related Items (2)
How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of dictator and ultimatum games ⋮ What can game theory tell us about an AI `theory of mind'?
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis
- Dual-process reasoning in charitable giving: learning from non-results
- Applying ``theory of mind: theory and experiments
- Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness
- A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity
- Strategic risk and response time across games
- Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
This page was built for publication: Theory of mind and general intelligence in dictator and ultimatum games
