Moral entitlements and aspiration formation in asymmetric bargaining: experimental evidence from Germany and China
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1656979
DOI10.3390/g8040044zbMath1410.91157OpenAlexW2765633281MaRDI QIDQ1656979
Heike Hennig-Schmidt, Gari Walkowitz
Publication date: 13 August 2018
Published in: Games (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g8040044
asymmetryfairnessaspiration levelsbargainingprominenceequity principlecultural comparisonmoral entitlementsvideo experiment
Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Experimental studies (91A90)
Related Items (2)
Editorial: Ethics, morality, and game theory ⋮ Asymmetric outside options in ultimatum bargaining: a systematic analysis
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims
- A unique solution to \(n\)-person sequential bargaining
- Do people exploit their bargaining power! An experimental study
- Two-person bargaining experiments with incomplete information
- Asymmetric outside options in ultimatum bargaining: a systematic analysis
- Outside options and social comparison in three-player ultimatum game experiments
- Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs
- Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment
- Moral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims
- Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
This page was built for publication: Moral entitlements and aspiration formation in asymmetric bargaining: experimental evidence from Germany and China
