A comparative analysis of two formulations for non linear hardening plasticity models: application to shakedown analysis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1657683
DOI10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.03.001zbMath1406.74134OpenAlexW2030933841MaRDI QIDQ1657683
Céline Bouby, Djimédo Kondo, Gery De Saxce
Publication date: 14 August 2018
Published in: European Journal of Mechanics. A. Solids (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.03.001
Anelastic fracture and damage (74R20) Large-strain, rate-independent theories of plasticity (including nonlinear plasticity) (74C15)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Dynamic shakedown analysis and bounds for elastoplastic structures with nonassociative, internal variable constitutive laws
- Shakedown theory for elastic-plastic kinematic hardening bodies
- Constitutive equations for cyclic plasticity and cyclic viscoplasticity
- Benchmark experiments and characteristic cyclic plasticity deformation
- On shakedown theory for elastic-plastic materials and extensions
- A simple model of generalized plasticity
- Endochronic inelasticity and incremental plasticity
- Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery. I: Formulation and basic features for ratchetting behavior. II: Applications to experiments of ratchetting behavior
- Limit analysis theorems for implicit standard materials: Application to the unilateral contact with dry friction and the non-associated flow rules in soils and rocks
- Inelastic behaviour of structures under variable repeated loads. Direct analysis methods. Lectures of the CISM-Course, Udine, October, 2000
- Mathematical analysis of the Armstrong-Frederick model from the theory of inelastic deformations of metals. First results and open problems
- A dual form for discretized kinematic formulation in shakedown analysis
- Two material models for cyclic plasticity: Nonlinear kinematic hardening and generalized plasticity
- On shakedown analysis in hardening plasticity.
- On the numerical algorithm for isotropic-kinematic hardening with the Armstrong-Frederick evolution of the back stress
- A kinematic elastic nonshakedown theorem for implicit standard materials
- A new approach to shakedown analysis for non-standard elastoplastic material by the bipotential.
- Shakedown theorems for some classes of nonassociative hardening elastic-plastic material models
- Shakedown analysis: comparison between models with the linear unlimited, linear limited and non linear kinematic hardening
- Pseudo-potentials and bipotential: a constructive procedure for non-associated plasticity and unilateral contact
- Characteristics of the Armstrong-Frederick type plasticity models
- Convex analysis and thermodynamics
- A comparison between analytical calculations of the shakedown load by the bipotential approach and step-by-step computations for elastoplastic materials with nonlinear kinematic hardening
- Endochronic theory, non-linear kinematic hardening rule and generalized plasticity: a new interpretation based on generalized normality assumption
- Shakedown theory in perfect elastoplasticity with associated and nonassociated flow-laws: A finite element linear programming approach
- Quasi-Static Evolution for the Armstrong-Frederick Hardening-Plasticity Model
- Mechanics of Solid Materials
- Endochronic Representation of Cyclic Creep and Relaxation of Metals
- Modeling of Cyclic Ratchetting Plasticity, Part I: Development of Constitutive Relations
- Convex Analysis
- On Conjugate Convex Functions
- Plasticity with nonlinear kinematic hardening: Modelling and shakedown analysis by the bipotential approach
This page was built for publication: A comparative analysis of two formulations for non linear hardening plasticity models: application to shakedown analysis
