Obligation as optimal goal satisfaction

DOI10.1007/s10992-017-9440-3zbMath1436.03135OpenAlexW2729633844WikidataQ59606513 ScholiaQ59606513MaRDI QIDQ1670486

Robert Kowalski, Ken Satoh

Publication date: 5 September 2018

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-017-9440-3

zbMATH Keywords

contrary-to-duty obligationsdeontic logicpreferencesgoalsabductive logic programmingnormative conflicts

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic programming (68N17)

Related Items (1)

Dischargeable Obligations in the 𝒮CIFF Framework

Cites Work

• Qualitative choice logic
• A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic
• A logical framework for default reasoning
• A logic for default reasoning
• The mathematics of non-monotonic reasoning
• Deontic logic as founded on nonmonotonic logic
• The independent choice logic for modelling multiple agents under uncertainty
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Boosting search with variable elimination in constraint optimization and constraint satisfaction problems
• Input/output logics
• Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
• Contrary-to-duty obligations
• Mapping deontic operators to abductive expectations
• Free choice permission is strong permission
• The Semantics of Predicate Logic as a Programming Language
• Algorithm = logic + control
• The IFF proof procedure for abductive logic programming
• Programming in logic without logic programming
• Computational Logic and Human Thinking
• An Analysis of some Deontic Logics
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Obligation as optimal goal satisfaction