Classical negation strikes back: why Priest's attack on classical negation can't succeed

DOI10.1007/s11787-017-0178-zzbMath1417.03041OpenAlexW2765486039MaRDI QIDQ1689563

Ederson Safra Melo, Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart

Publication date: 12 January 2018

Published in: Logica Universalis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0178-z

zbMATH Keywords

liar paradoxdialetheismcontradictionBoolean negationDe Morgan negation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Paraconsistent logics (03B53)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Liberating paraconsistency from contradiction
• Paraconsistent logics?
• Things that are right with the traditional square of opposition
• ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTION, DIALETHEISM, AND REVENGE
• Round Squares Are No Contradictions (Tutorial on Negation Contradiction and Opposition)
• Truth, Trivialism, and Perceptual Illusions
• Trivializing sentences and the promise of semantic completeness

This page was built for publication: Classical negation strikes back: why Priest's attack on classical negation can't succeed