Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning

DOI10.1016/j.artint.2017.09.002zbMath1423.68478OpenAlexW2760144600MaRDI QIDQ1690960

Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon

Publication date: 12 January 2018

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2017.09.002

zbMATH Keywords

expected utilityultimatum gamePrisoner's dilemmapractical reasoningargumentation schemesvalue-based reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Decision theory for games (91A35) Utility theory for games (91A30) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
• Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Computational representation of practical argument
• Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
• STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving
• On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract
• Value-based Argumentation Frameworks as Neural-symbolic Learning Systems
• Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
• Alternating-time temporal logic
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition

This page was built for publication: Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning