Do beliefs about peers matter for donation matching? Experiments in the field and laboratory

DOI10.1016/j.geb.2017.11.002zbMath1393.91032OpenAlexW3124126758MaRDI QIDQ1691368

Laura K. Gee, Michael J. Schreck

Publication date: 16 January 2018

Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00538.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

beliefscharitable givingpublic goodsfield experiment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Public goods (91B18) Experimental studies (91A90)

Related Items (2)

Peers or police?: the effect of choice and type of monitoring in the provision of public goods ⋮ From lab to field: social distance and charitable giving in teams

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

Cites Work

• Belief elicitation in experiments: Is there a hedging problem?
• Matching and challenge gifts to charity: evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments
• Subsidizing charitable contributions: a natural field experiment comparing matching and rebate subsidies
• Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule
• A model of noisy introspection.
• First- and second-order subjective expectations in strategic decision-making: experimental evidence
• When Does One Bad Apple Spoil the Barrel? An Evolutionary Analysis of Collective Action
• Level-k Auctions: Can a Nonequilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winner's Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?

This page was built for publication: Do beliefs about peers matter for donation matching? Experiments in the field and laboratory