Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1693566
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2017.11.002zbMath1425.68391OpenAlexW2767434471MaRDI QIDQ1693566
Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang
Publication date: 31 January 2018
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2017.11.002
structured argumentationprioritiesattack removal functionsregular and canonical attack relationswell-prioritized rule-based systems
Related Items
A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation ⋮ Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses ⋮ Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis ⋮ Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications ⋮ Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities ⋮ Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
Cites Work
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Lexicographic priorities in default logic
- Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- Abstract argumentation systems
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Closure and Consistency In Logic-Associated Argumentation
- Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentation
- RP-DeLP: a weighted defeasible argumentation framework based on a recursive semantics
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- On Decision Problems Related to the Preferred Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- A framework for compiling preferences in logic programs
- Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
