When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1698965
DOI10.1007/S11238-017-9600-5zbMath1395.91114OpenAlexW2608158229WikidataQ59613364 ScholiaQ59613364MaRDI QIDQ1698965
Yudistira Permana, Nuttaporn Rochanahastin, John D. Hey
Publication date: 16 February 2018
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9600-5
Related Items (3)
Behavioral patterns and reduction of sub-optimality: an experimental choice analysis ⋮ Explaining satisficing through risk aversion ⋮ Experimental evidence of behavioral improvement by learning and intermediate advice
Cites Work
- The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity
- Choice with imprecise information: An experimental approach
- The shape of incomplete preferences
- Attitude toward imprecise information
- Aspiration adaptation theory
- Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom.
- Optimize, satisfice, or choose without deliberation? A simple minimax-regret assessment
- Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice
- Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude
- Revealed preferences under uncertainty: incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization
- Incomplete Preferences Under Uncertainty: Indecisiveness in Beliefs versus Tastes
- Vector Expected Utility and Attitudes Toward Variation
- Optimal Search
- Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
- Choice by iterative search
- Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment
- Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets
- A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity
- Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study
This page was built for publication: When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation
