When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation

DOI10.1007/S11238-017-9600-5zbMath1395.91114OpenAlexW2608158229WikidataQ59613364 ScholiaQ59613364MaRDI QIDQ1698965

Yudistira Permana, Nuttaporn Rochanahastin, John D. Hey

Publication date: 16 February 2018

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9600-5

zbMATH Keywords

experimentssatisficingcost of deliberationHerbert Simonno deliberationoptimising

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Experimental studies (91A90)

Related Items (3)

Behavioral patterns and reduction of sub-optimality: an experimental choice analysis ⋮ Explaining satisficing through risk aversion ⋮ Experimental evidence of behavioral improvement by learning and intermediate advice

Cites Work

• The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity
• Choice with imprecise information: An experimental approach
• The shape of incomplete preferences
• Attitude toward imprecise information
• Aspiration adaptation theory
• Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom.
• Optimize, satisfice, or choose without deliberation? A simple minimax-regret assessment
• Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice
• Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude
• Revealed preferences under uncertainty: incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization
• Incomplete Preferences Under Uncertainty: Indecisiveness in Beliefs versus Tastes
• Vector Expected Utility and Attitudes Toward Variation
• Optimal Search
• Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
• Choice by iterative search
• Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment
• Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets
• A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity
• Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study

This page was built for publication: When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation