A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement

DOI10.1007/s10670-015-9800-8zbMath1408.91034OpenAlexW104028564WikidataQ59478754 ScholiaQ59478754MaRDI QIDQ1706763

Remco Heesen, Pieter van der Kolk

Publication date: 28 March 2018

Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9800-8

zbMATH Keywords

rationalityepistemologygame-theoretic modelconciliatory viewpeer disagreementsteadfast view

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26)

Related Items

Group disagreement: a belief aggregation perspective

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
• We can't disagree forever
• Agreeing to disagree
• Propositional reasoning that tracks probabilistic reasoning
• Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement
• Disagreement and Evidential Attenuation
• A Reason-Based Theory of Rational Choice *
• Dr. Truthlove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Bayesian Probabilities*
• Reliable Methods of Judgement Aggregation
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Reaching a Consensus