Optimize, satisfice, or choose without deliberation? A simple minimax-regret assessment
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1706786
DOI10.1007/s11238-017-9592-1zbMath1395.91120OpenAlexW2593398999MaRDI QIDQ1706786
Publication date: 28 March 2018
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9592-1
Related Items (4)
Behavioral patterns and reduction of sub-optimality: an experimental choice analysis ⋮ Explaining satisficing through risk aversion ⋮ When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation ⋮ Experimental evidence of behavioral improvement by learning and intermediate advice
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Actualist rationality
- Minimax regret treatment choice with covariates or with limited validity of experiments
- Cognitive constraints, contraction consistency, and the satisficing criterion
- Naive, resolute or sophisticated? A study of dynamic decision making
- Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. 2nd ed
- Learning and decision making when subjective probabilities have subjective domains
- Minimax, information and ultrapessimism
- Satisficing
- Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
- Accurate Approximations for Posterior Moments and Marginal Densities
- Internal Consistency of Choice
- An Essentially Complete Class of Admissible Decision Functions
- The Theory of Statistical Decision
- Sequential Minimax Search for a Maximum
- Rational Selection of Decision Functions
This page was built for publication: Optimize, satisfice, or choose without deliberation? A simple minimax-regret assessment
