Deontic modals: why abandon the default approach

DOI10.1007/s10670-017-9879-1zbMath1417.03065OpenAlexW2586272142MaRDI QIDQ1707219

André Fuhrmann

Publication date: 29 March 2018

Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9879-1

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (3)

Is, ought, and cut ⋮ Defeasible normative reasoning ⋮ Dynamic logic of legal competences

Cites Work

• Dyadic deontic detachment
• A logic for default reasoning
• Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic
• Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
• Contrary-to-duty obligations
• Propositional calculus for contradictory deductive systems
• Defaults with priorities
• Norm Change in the Common Law
• Reasoning with Moral Conflicts
• Logic for Equivocators
• An Analysis of some Deontic Logics
• Handbook of philosophical logic. Vol. 3.
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Deontic modals: why abandon the default approach