Why follow the royal rule?

DOI10.1007/s11229-015-1004-xzbMath1417.03069OpenAlexW2223108213MaRDI QIDQ1708791

Franz Huber

Publication date: 27 March 2018

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-1004-x

zbMATH Keywords

counterfactualstrackingranking functionsconditional beliefmodal idealismroyal rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Related Items (1)

COMPLETENESS FOR COUNTER-DOXA CONDITIONALS – USING RANKING SEMANTICS

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• The logic of conditionals. An application of probability to deductive logic
• What should I believe about what would have been the case?
• Qualitative probabilities for default reasoning, belief revision, and causal modeling
• The measurement of ranks and the laws of iterated contraction
• The consistency argument for ranking functions
• Ranking functions and rankings on languages
• Antecedent-relative comparative world similarity
• New foundations for counterfactuals
• On Spohn's rule for revision of beliefs
• STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS AND BEYOND

This page was built for publication: Why follow the royal rule?