Epistemology versus non-causal realism

DOI10.1007/S11229-015-1010-ZzbMath1382.03035OpenAlexW2288160302MaRDI QIDQ1708792

Jared Warren

Publication date: 27 March 2018

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-1010-z

zbMATH Keywords

realismepistemologyepistemological arguments against realismreliability challenge

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Related Items (3)

Realism, reliability, and epistemic possibility: on modally interpreting the Benacerraf-Field challenge ⋮ Counterpossibles for modal normativists ⋮ A metasemantic challenge for mathematical determinacy

Cites Work

• Conventionalism, consistency, and consistency sentences
• Radical interpretation
• A Platonist epistemology.
• What is Absolute Undecidability?†
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Epistemology versus non-causal realism