Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1711894
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2018.06.008zbMath1451.68262OpenAlexW2816362554WikidataQ110528573 ScholiaQ110528573MaRDI QIDQ1711894
Andrea Cohen, Guillermo R. Simari, Sebastian Gottifredi, Alejandro Javier García
Publication date: 18 January 2019
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.06.008
Related Items
A structured bipolar argumentation theory for providing explanations in practical reasoning ⋮ On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach ⋮ Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks and evidence-based supports
- Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- An Axiomatic Approach to Support in Argumentation
- Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework
- Arguing about the Trustworthiness of the Information Sources
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Abductive Reasoning on Molecular Interaction Maps
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- Computing Preferred Extensions in Abstract Argumentation: A SAT-Based Approach
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
