Is social responsibility for firms competing on quantity evolutionary stable?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1716946
DOI10.3934/jimo.2017049zbMath1412.91006OpenAlexW2637088364MaRDI QIDQ1716946
Tiaojun Xiao, Caichun Chai, Eilin Francis
Publication date: 5 February 2019
Published in: Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2017049
Related Items
Pricing, environmental governance efficiency, and channel coordination in a socially responsible tourism supply chain ⋮ How points-exchange incentives in a closed-loop supply chain weaken competition from the informal recycler ⋮ Evolution of revenue preference for competing firms with nonlinear inverse demand
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: insights from wholesale price contracts
- The evolution of fairness under an assortative matching rule in the ultimatum game
- Advance selling decisions with overconfident consumers
- Conspicuous consumption dynamics
- Wholesale pricing and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers with imperfectly observable objective
- The indirect evolutionary approach to explaining fair allocations
- Wholesale pricing and evolutionary stable strategies of retailers under network externality
- Altruism, equity, and reciprocity in a gift-exchange experiment: An encompassing approach.
- The dynamical theory of coevolution: A derivation from stochastic ecological processes
- Heterogeneous or homogeneous quantity competition
- Equilibrium vengeance
- Supply chain disruption management and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers in the quantity-setting duopoly situation with homogeneous goods
- Salesforce contract design, joint pricing and production planning with asymmetric overconfidence sales agent
- Evolutionary Games in Economics
- A Theory of the Stakeholder Corporation
- Corporate Governance
- Evolution of Preferences1
- Preference evolution and reciprocity
