Measuring conflicts using cardinal ranking: an application to decision analytic conflict evaluations
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1738979
DOI10.1155/2018/8290434zbMath1412.90063OpenAlexW2893261532MaRDI QIDQ1738979
Aron Larsson, Love Ekenberg, Tobias Fasth, Mats Danielson
Publication date: 24 April 2019
Published in: Advances in Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8290434
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions
- A framework for participatory decision support using Pareto frontier visualization, goal identification and arbitration
- An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI
- A linear programming approach for learning non-monotonic additive value functions in multiple criteria decision aiding
- Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys
- The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: case study
- Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application
- Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions
- Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights
- Augmenting Ordinal Methods of Attribute Weight Approximation
- MACBETH — An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions
- Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience.
This page was built for publication: Measuring conflicts using cardinal ranking: an application to decision analytic conflict evaluations