Measuring conflicts using cardinal ranking: an application to decision analytic conflict evaluations

DOI10.1155/2018/8290434zbMath1412.90063OpenAlexW2893261532MaRDI QIDQ1738979

Aron Larsson, Love Ekenberg, Tobias Fasth, Mats Danielson

Publication date: 24 April 2019

Published in: Advances in Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8290434

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Uses Software

• DecideIT
• M-MACBETH
• VisualUTA

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions
• A framework for participatory decision support using Pareto frontier visualization, goal identification and arbitration
• An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI
• A linear programming approach for learning non-monotonic additive value functions in multiple criteria decision aiding
• Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys
• The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: case study
• Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application
• Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions
• Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights
• Augmenting Ordinal Methods of Attribute Weight Approximation
• MACBETH — An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions
• Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience.

This page was built for publication: Measuring conflicts using cardinal ranking: an application to decision analytic conflict evaluations