Comparison of surface and volume integral methods for transonic propeller acoustic predictions

DOI10.1016/J.COMPFLUID.2018.10.015zbMath1411.76121OpenAlexW2897816830WikidataQ129104728 ScholiaQ129104728MaRDI QIDQ1739682

G. Rahier

Publication date: 26 April 2019

Published in: Computers and Fluids (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.10.015

zbMATH Keywords

computational aeroacousticsacoustic integral methodsquadrupolar noiseFfowcs Williams-hawkingstransonic rotors

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Transonic flows (76H05) Hydro- and aero-acoustics (76Q05) Numerical integration (65D30)

Uses Software

• elsA

Cites Work

• Additional terms for the use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings surface integrals in turbulent flows
• Numerical error analysis with application to transonic propeller aeroacoustics
• Aeroacoustic integral methods, formulation and efficient numerical implementation
• New perspectives in the use of the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation for aeroacoustic analysis of rotating blades
• A coupled time-reversal/complex differentiation method for aeroacoustic sensitivity analysis: towards a source detection procedure
• Numerical Algorithms for Acoustic Integrals with Examples for Rotor Noise Prediction
• Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion
• On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory

This page was built for publication: Comparison of surface and volume integral methods for transonic propeller acoustic predictions