Revisiting consistency with random utility maximisation: theory and implications for practical work
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1744211
DOI10.1007/s11238-017-9651-7zbMath1395.91180OpenAlexW2782280549WikidataQ59884845 ScholiaQ59884845MaRDI QIDQ1744211
Stephane Hess, Richard Batley, Andrew Daly
Publication date: 16 April 2018
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9651-7
Related Items (2)
Modelling consideration heterogeneity in a two-stage conjunctive model ⋮ Joint location and cost planning in maximum capture facility location under random utilities
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- On the compatibility of nested logit models with utility maximization
- Testing the consistency of nested logit models with utility maximization
- On the equivalence between elimination-by-aspects and generalised extreme value models of choice behaviour
- Choice by elimination
- Compensating Variation and Hicksian Choice Probabilities in Random Utility Models that are Nonlinear in Income
- The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
- Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
- Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
- Context-Dependent Preferences
- "Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences
- Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets
This page was built for publication: Revisiting consistency with random utility maximisation: theory and implications for practical work