The importance of voting order for jury decisions by sequential majority voting

DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.053zbMath1394.91113OpenAlexW2271727958MaRDI QIDQ1751748

Bo Chen, Steven Alpern

Publication date: 25 May 2018

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.053

zbMATH Keywords

group decisionsequential votingjury of expertsvoting order

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Voting theory (91B12)

Related Items (4)

Optimizing voting order on sequential juries: a median voter theorem and beyond ⋮ Who should cast the casting vote? Using sequential voting to amalgamate information ⋮ An iterative approach for achieving consensus when ranking a finite set of alternatives by a group of experts ⋮ A functional equation of tail-balance for continuous signals in the Condorcet jury theorem

Cites Work

• Beyond Condorcet: optimal aggregation rules using voting records
• A sequential selection game with vetoes
• A brief note on a further refinement of the Condorcet jury theorem for heterogeneous groups
• Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
• Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
• Comparative Reliability of Verdicts
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: The importance of voting order for jury decisions by sequential majority voting