Composite indicators as generalized benefit-of-the-doubt weighted averages
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.048zbMath1403.90432OpenAlexW2774197750MaRDI QIDQ1754248
Publication date: 30 May 2018
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/608681
data envelopment analysiscomposite indicatorhuman development indexbenefit-of-the-doubt modelgeneralized mean aggregation
Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Special problems of linear programming (transportation, multi-index, data envelopment analysis, etc.) (90C08) Statistical methods; economic indices and measures (91B82)
Related Items (6)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
- Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis
- Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
- Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA
- The fuzzy weighted average within a generalized means function
- Data envelopment analysis with nonlinear virtual inputs and outputs
- Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach.
- On aggregating benefit of the doubt composite indicators
- Geometric mean quantity index numbers with benefit-of-the-doubt weights
- On aggregate Farrell efficiencies
- Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques as Tools for the Quality Assessment of Composite Indicators
- Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses
- Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview
- A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis
- Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index
- A $k$-Sample Model in Order Statistics
This page was built for publication: Composite indicators as generalized benefit-of-the-doubt weighted averages