Common belief of weak-dominance rationality in strategic-form games: a qualitative analysis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1756339
DOI10.1016/j.geb.2018.09.003zbMath1419.91125OpenAlexW2890630730WikidataQ129205906 ScholiaQ129205906MaRDI QIDQ1756339
Publication date: 14 January 2019
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hn8r6cp
Related Items (6)
Formalizing common belief with no underlying assumption on individual beliefs ⋮ Non-Bayesian correlated equilibrium as an expression of non-Bayesian rationality ⋮ The existence of universal qualitative belief spaces ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Dominance rationality: a unified approach ⋮ Optimism and pessimism in strategic interactions under ignorance
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Epistemic characterizations of iterated deletion of inferior strategy profiles in preference-based type spaces
- A minimal logic for interactive epistemology
- An impossibility theorem on beliefs in games
- The axioms of subjective probability
- The Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games
- Qualitative probability as an intensional logic
- On Stalnaker's notion of strong rationalizability and Nash equilibrium in perfect information games
- On the evaluation of solution concepts
- Interactive epistemology. I: Knowledge
- The role of monotonicity in the epistemic analysis of strategic games
- Measurement structures and linear inequalities
- Universal knowledge-belief structures
- QUALITATIVE MODALITIES
- Foundational aspects of theories of measurement
- A completeness theorem in modal logic
- Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria
- Common Belief with the Logic of Individual Belief
- Pure Strategy Dominance
- On Qualitative Probability
- Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model
- "Beliefs about Beliefs" without Probabilities
This page was built for publication: Common belief of weak-dominance rationality in strategic-form games: a qualitative analysis