Fairness, public good, and emotional aspects of punishment behavior

DOI10.1007/S11238-004-3672-8zbMath1090.91516OpenAlexW2002220562MaRDI QIDQ1774548

Abdolkarim Sadrieh, Shmuel Zamir, Klaus Abbink

Publication date: 17 May 2005

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-3672-8

zbMATH Keywords

fairnessultimatum bargainingpublic goodsexperimental economicspunishment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Games in extensive form (91A18) Experimental studies (91A90)

Related Items (2)

Does observation influence learning? ⋮ Persuasion in experimental ultimatum games

Uses Software

• RatImage

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Partners and strangers revisited
• Sophisticated experience-weighted attraction learning and strategic teaching in repeated games
• A theory of sequential reciprocity
• Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game
• Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term
• Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining
• An Experimental Study of the Centipede Game
• A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
• Experience-weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games
• Adaptive learning versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining

This page was built for publication: Fairness, public good, and emotional aspects of punishment behavior