Sign symmetry vs symmetry: Young's characterization of the Shapley value revisited
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1787689
DOI10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.017zbMath1397.91028OpenAlexW2803107942WikidataQ129777687 ScholiaQ129777687MaRDI QIDQ1787689
Publication date: 5 October 2018
Published in: Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.017
symmetrystrong monotonicityShapley valueTU gamemarginalityweak differential monotonicitysign symmetry
Related Items (9)
A note on sign symmetry for a subclass of efficient, symmetric, and linear values ⋮ Necessary versus equal players in axiomatic studies ⋮ Gain-loss and new axiomatizations of the Shapley value ⋮ Allocating extra revenues from broadcasting sports leagues ⋮ Parallel axiomatizations of weighted and multiweighted Shapley values, random order values, and the Harsanyi set ⋮ Similarities in axiomatizations: equal surplus division value and first-price auctions ⋮ Relaxations of symmetry and the weighted Shapley values ⋮ The grand surplus value and repeated cooperative cross-games with coalitional collaboration ⋮ Marginalism, egalitarianism and efficiency in multi-choice games
Cites Work
- Weak differential marginality and the Shapley value
- Differential marginality, van den Brink fairness, and the Shapley value
- Monotonic solutions of cooperative games
- Conference structures and fair allocation rules
- Weakly balanced contributions and solutions for cooperative games
- Null or nullifying players: the difference between the Shapley value and equal division solutions
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: Sign symmetry vs symmetry: Young's characterization of the Shapley value revisited
