Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1839180
DOI10.1007/BF00125672zbMath0511.90011WikidataQ56568394 ScholiaQ56568394MaRDI QIDQ1839180
Guillermo Owen, Bernard Grofman, Scott L. Feld
Publication date: 1983
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Related Items
Conditions for the optimality of simple majority decisions in pairwise choice situations, One person/one vote is not efficient given information on factions, Is diversity in capabilities desirable when adding decision makers?, A Condorcet jury theorem for couples, First and second best voting rules in committees, A model of jury decisions where all jurors have the same evidence, One person, one weight: when is weighted voting democratic?, Robustness of optimal majority rules over teams with changing size, Extending the Condorcet jury theorem to a general dependent jury, Scoring rules for judgment aggregation, A Decision-Making Approach to the Spam Problem, Dealing with expert bias in collective decision-making, Information structures and information aggregation in threshold equilibria in elections, Symmetric and asymmetric committees, SOCIAL INFLUENCE STRENGTHENS CROWD WISDOM UNDER VOTING, General representation of epistemically optimal procedures, Unveiling the truth in liquid democracy with misinformed voters, Who should cast the casting vote? Using sequential voting to amalgamate information, Crowdvoting Judgment: An Analysis of Modern Peer Review, Beyond Condorcet: optimal aggregation rules using voting records, The generalized homogeneity assumption and the Condorcet jury theorem, Aggregating disparate estimates of chance, On the merit of non-specialization in the context of majority voting, A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation, The importance of voting order for jury decisions by sequential majority voting, Expert rule versus majority rule under partial information, Monotonicity in Condorcet's jury theorem with dependent voters, Generalized means of jurors' competencies and marginal changes of jury's size, Algorithmic calculation of the optimality probability of decision rules, Comparison of the polar decision rules for various types of distributions, Optimal collective dichotomous choice under partial order constraints, Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective, A general jury theorem on group decision making, Extended Poisson games and the Condorcet jury theorem, Condorcet consistent scoring rules and single-peakedness, A general theorem and eight corollaries in search of correct decision, Partial information on decisional competences and the desirability of the expert rule in uncertain dichotomous choice situations, Performance evaluation of some special classes of weighted majority rules, Range of Asymptotic Behaviour of the Optimality Probability of the Expert and Majority Rules, Majority vote of even and odd experts in a polychotomous choice situation, A brief note on a further refinement of the Condorcet jury theorem for heterogeneous groups, The significance of independent decisions in uncertain dichotomous choice situations, Liquid Democracy: An Algorithmic Perspective, Potential variability of decisional skills in uncertain dichotomous choice situations, Opinion leaders, independence, and Condorcet's jury theorem, Introducing difference into the Condorcet jury theorem
Cites Work
