On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2000 and Excel XP.

DOI10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00095-6zbMath1043.68114WikidataQ56057563 ScholiaQ56057563MaRDI QIDQ1852885

B. D. McCullough, Berry Wilson

Publication date: 21 January 2003

Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to statistics (62-04)

Related Items (12)

The reliability of statistical functions in four software packages freely used in numerical computation ⋮ On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003 ⋮ Statistical functions and procedures in IDL 5.6 and 6.0 ⋮ Polynomial trendline function flaws in Microsoft Excel ⋮ The convergence of estimators based on heuristics: theory and application to a GARCH model ⋮ On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2010 ⋮ Excel :: COM :: R ⋮ Nonstandard operator precedence in Excel ⋮ A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages ⋮ On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2007 ⋮ The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft\(^{\circledR}\) Excel 2007 ⋮ Microsoft Excel's `Not the Wichmann-Hill' random number generators

Uses Software

• Mathematica
• Stata
• Excel
• Diehard

Cites Work

• On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 97.
• The accuracy of \textit{Mathematica 4} as a statistical package
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2000 and Excel XP.