Mathematical Research Data Initiative
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Create a new Item
Create a new Property
Create a new EntitySchema
Merge two items
In other projects
Discussion
View source
View history
Purge
English
Log in

Is a small Monte Carlo analysis a good analysis? Checking the size, power and consistency of a simulation-based test

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1856576
Jump to:navigation, search

DOI10.1007/s00362-002-0124-9zbMath1008.62018OpenAlexW2605218479MaRDI QIDQ1856576

Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza

Publication date: 10 February 2003

Published in: Statistical Papers (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-002-0124-9



Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Monte Carlo methods (65C05)


Related Items (1)

Semiparametric efficient adaptive estimation of the GJR-GARCH model



Cites Work

  • Unnamed Item
  • Seasonal integration and cointegration
  • Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?
  • An analysis of five simulation methods for determining the number of replications in a complex Monte Carlo study
  • Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors
  • Testing for nonstationary parameter specifications in seasonal time series models
  • Testing for Common Trends
  • Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root




This page was built for publication: Is a small Monte Carlo analysis a good analysis? Checking the size, power and consistency of a simulation-based test

Retrieved from "https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/w/index.php?title=Publication:1856576&oldid=14240456"
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link
Page information
MaRDI portal item
This page was last edited on 1 February 2024, at 11:14.
Privacy policy
About MaRDI portal
Disclaimers
Imprint
Powered by MediaWiki