Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency

DOI10.1006/jeem.2001.1199zbMath1024.91005OpenAlexW2049581452MaRDI QIDQ1865360

German Fermo, J. R. DeShazo

Publication date: 26 March 2003

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1199

zbMATH Keywords

complexityconsumer choicechoice consistency and heteroskedastic logit

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Related Items (14)

Decomposition-based co-evolutionary algorithm for interactive multiple objective optimization ⋮ Heuristics for selecting pair-wise elicitation questions in multiple criteria choice problems ⋮ Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness ⋮ Heterogeneity in general multinomial choice models ⋮ Effect of choice complexity on design efficiency in conjoint choice experiments ⋮ Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention ⋮ EMOSOR: evolutionary multiple objective optimization guided by interactive stochastic ordinal regression ⋮ Normalization is a general neural mechanism for context-dependent decision making ⋮ Optimal stated preference choice experiments when all choice sets contain a specific option ⋮ The optimal size of choice sets in choice experiments ⋮ Updating subjective risks in the presence of conflicting information: an application to climate change ⋮ Design strategies for sequential choice experiments involving economic alternatives ⋮ Dynamic Assortment Personalization in High Dimensions ⋮ Possible design-induced artifacts associated with designs for discrete choice experiments

This page was built for publication: Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency