Eliciting information from multiple experts

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1867028

DOI10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00003-9zbMath1024.91001MaRDI QIDQ1867028

Asher Wolinsky

Publication date: 2 April 2003

Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)


zbMATH Keywords

communicationinformation transmissionmultiple experts


Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Noncooperative games (91A10) Signaling and communication in game theory (91A28) Decision theory for games (91A35)


Related Items

A model of reporting and controlling outbreaks by public health agencies, Two-sided strategic information transmission, Picking the winners, Consistency and communication in committees, Voting in small committees, Strategic information transmission networks, Eliciting information from a committee, Evaluation and strategic manipulation, When to ask for an update: timing in strategic communication, The organization of expertise in the presence of communication, Independent versus collective expertise, Expert panels with selective investigation, An integrated data envelopment analysis and simulation method for group consensus ranking, Communication in financial markets with several informed traders, The limited value of a second opinion: competition and exaggeration in experimental cheap talk games, Aggregating experts' opinions to select the winner of a competition, Should straw polls be banned?, Subgroup deliberation and voting, Aggregation of expert opinions, Eliciting socially optimal rankings from unfair jurors, Consulting an expert with potentially conflicting preferences, Designing communication hierarchies, Almost fully revealing cheap talk with imperfectly informed senders, Rational exaggeration and counter-exaggeration in information aggregation games, Competitive cheap talk



Cites Work

Retrieved from "https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/w/index.php?title=Publication:1867028&oldid=14256680"
Powered by MediaWiki