Coronary risk prediction by logical analysis of data

DOI10.1023/A:1022970120229zbMath1026.62119MaRDI QIDQ1870368

Claire E. Pothier Snader, Michael S. Lauer, Peter L. Hammer, Sorin Alexe, Hemant Ishwaran, Eugene H. Blackstone

Publication date: 11 May 2003

Published in: Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

classificationdata miningrisk predictionlogical analysis of datapartially defined Boolean functionsrisk indices

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Applications of mathematical programming (90C90) Medical applications (general) (92C50)

Related Items

Graph, clique and facet of Boolean logical polytope ⋮ Logical analysis of data -- the vision of Peter L. Hammer ⋮ Pattern-based feature selection in genomics and proteomics ⋮ Logical analysis of data -- an overview: from combinatorial optimization to medical applications ⋮ Integrated optimization model and algorithm for pattern generation and selection in logical analysis of data ⋮ Strong valid inequalities for Boolean logical pattern generation ⋮ Interface between logical analysis of data and formal concept analysis ⋮ Logical analysis of multiclass data with relaxed patterns ⋮ Recent advances in the theory and practice of logical analysis of data ⋮ On Pareto-optimal Boolean logical patterns for numerical data ⋮ Multi-pattern generation framework for logical analysis of data ⋮ Comprehensive vs. comprehensible classifiers in logical analysis of data ⋮ Spanned patterns for the logical analysis of data ⋮ Subset-conjunctive rules for breast cancer diagnosis ⋮ A multi-term, polyhedral relaxation of a 0-1 multilinear function for Boolean logical pattern generation ⋮ \(0\text{-}1\) multilinear programming as a unifying theory for LAD pattern generation ⋮ Predictive models for bariatric surgery risks with imbalanced medical datasets ⋮ Efficient feature selection for logical analysis of large-scale multi-class datasets ⋮ Carpal tunnel syndrome automatic classification: electromyography vs. ultrasound imaging