Response surface methodology's steepest ascent and step size revisited

DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00414-4zbMath1067.90116OpenAlexW1966199221MaRDI QIDQ1876165

Ebru Angün, Dick den Hertog, Jack P. C. Kleijnen

Publication date: 16 August 2004

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00414-4

zbMATH Keywords

HeuristicsStatistical analysisMetaheuristicsRSMScale-dependence

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Approximation methods and heuristics in mathematical programming (90C59) Operations research and management science (90B99)

Related Items

Newsvendor-type models with decision-dependent uncertainty ⋮ Two‐stage computing budget allocation approach for the response surface method ⋮ Response surface methodology's steepest ascent and step size revisited: Correction

Uses Software

• EGO

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• On \(D\)-optimality based trust regions for black-box optimization problems
• Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions
• Design and analysis of computer experiments. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• Feature Article: Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. Practice
• Simulation Designs and Correlation Induction for Reducing Second-Order Bias in First-Order Response Surfaces
• Trust Region Methods
• Simulation Designs for the Estimation of Quadratic Response Surface Gradients in the Presence of Model Misspecification
• Minimizing the bias and variance of the gradient estimate in RSM simulation studies