The Dodgson ranking and the Borda count: a binary comparison

DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2003.11.003zbMath1091.91020OpenAlexW2076349659MaRDI QIDQ1887443

Christian Klamler

Publication date: 26 November 2004

Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2003.11.003

zbMATH Keywords

distance functionsVoting paradoxVoting rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12) Individual preferences (91B08)

Related Items (5)

A comparison between the prudent order and the ranking obtained with Borda's, Copeland's, Slater's and Kemeny's rules ⋮ Neural voting machines ⋮ On the approximability of Dodgson and Young elections ⋮ Approximability of Dodgson's rule ⋮ Unnamed Item

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Tournament solutions and majority voting
• Condorcet choice correspondences: A set-theoretical comparison
• The Dodgson ranking and its relation to Kemeny's method and Slater's rule
• A comparison of Dodgson's method and the Borda count
• A comparison of Dodgson's method and Kemeny's rule
• Condorcet Social Choice Functions
• Basic Geometry of Voting

This page was built for publication: The Dodgson ranking and the Borda count: a binary comparison