A response to comments on `Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation'.

DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2003.09.018zbMath1081.90570OpenAlexW1975722281WikidataQ125904208 ScholiaQ125904208MaRDI QIDQ1887950

Lawrence M. Seiford, Joe Zhu

Publication date: 22 November 2004

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.09.018

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items

Performance evaluation of China’s industry: a generalized equilibrium data envelopment analysis approach with fixed-sum undesirable output ⋮ Technical change and pollution abatement costs ⋮ Environmental efficiency analysis based on relational two-stage DEA model ⋮ Evaluating eco-efficiency with data envelopment analysis: an analytical reexamination ⋮ Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China's thermal power industry: a data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach ⋮ Mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Data envelopment analysis and big data ⋮ DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs ⋮ The performance of commercial banks based on a context‐dependent range‐adjusted measure model ⋮ Generalized estimation of productivity with multiple bad outputs: the importance of materials balance constraints

Cites Work

• Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions
• Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis
• On piecewise loglinear frontiers and log efficiency measures.
• Duality, classification and slacks in DEA
• Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation
• Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment
• Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure