Lack of dissipativity is not symplecticness
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1899935
DOI10.1007/BF01737166zbMath0844.65062OpenAlexW2051012697MaRDI QIDQ1899935
Publication date: 29 August 1996
Published in: BIT (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01737166
Hamiltonian systemsKepler problemsymplectic algorithmfourth-order three stage Runge-Kutta-Nyström algorithmnondissipative algorithm
Numerical methods for initial value problems involving ordinary differential equations (65L05) Multistep, Runge-Kutta and extrapolation methods for ordinary differential equations (65L06) Dynamical systems and ergodic theory (37-XX)
Related Items (4)
A conservative fourth-order real space method for the (2+1)D Dirac equation ⋮ A high-order explicit Runge-Kutta pair for initial value problems with oscillating solutions ⋮ Relaxation Runge-Kutta methods for Hamiltonian problems ⋮ High-order zero-dissipative Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods
Cites Work
- Variable step size does not harm second-order integrators for Hamiltonian systems
- Order conditions for canonical Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods
- Fourth-order symplectic integration
- A symplectic integration algorithm for separable Hamiltonian functions
- Explicit Runge–Kutta (–Nyström) Methods with Reduced Phase Errors for Computing Oscillating Solutions
- The Development of Variable-Step Symplectic Integrators, with Application to the Two-Body Problem
- Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I
- The canonicity of mappings generated by Runge-Kutta type methods when integrating the systems
- Some properties of methods for the numerical integration of systems of the form
- The accuracy of symplectic integrators
- An Explicit Runge–Kutta–Nyström Method is Canonical If and Only If Its Adjoint is Explicit
- Explicit Canonical Methods for Hamiltonian Systems
- High-Order Symplectic Runge–Kutta–Nyström Methods
- On the Numerical Integration of Ordinary Differential Equations by Symmetric Composition Methods
This page was built for publication: Lack of dissipativity is not symplecticness