The Chebyshev methods of Panovsky and Richardson as Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods
DOI10.1016/0377-0427(94)00074-9zbMath0839.65080OpenAlexW1990263287MaRDI QIDQ1903664
Andrew S. Booth, John P. Coleman
Publication date: 16 June 1996
Published in: Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(94)00074-9
numerical experimentstwo-body problemRunge-Kutta-Nyström methodsrounding errorsChebyshev methodstwo-step implicit methodsvariable steplength
Nonlinear ordinary differential equations and systems (34A34) Two-body problems (70F05) Numerical methods for initial value problems involving ordinary differential equations (65L05) Multistep, Runge-Kutta and extrapolation methods for ordinary differential equations (65L06) Error bounds for numerical methods for ordinary differential equations (65L70) Mesh generation, refinement, and adaptive methods for ordinary differential equations (65L50)
Related Items (2)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Variable step size does not harm second-order integrators for Hamiltonian systems
- Rational approximations for the cosine function; P-acceptability and order
- Stability of collocation-based Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods
- A family of implicit Chebyshev methods for the numerical integration of second-order differential equations
- Analysis of a family of Chebyshev methods for \(y=f(x,y)\)
- On the method for numerical integration of Clenshaw and Curtis
- The Development of Variable-Step Symplectic Integrators, with Application to the Two-Body Problem
- Stability of collocation methods for the numerical solution ofy″=f (x,y)
- An Explicit Runge–Kutta–Nyström Method is Canonical If and Only If Its Adjoint is Explicit
- Collocation at Gaussian Points
This page was built for publication: The Chebyshev methods of Panovsky and Richardson as Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods
